What is the difference between a software and hardware raid. If you really must run raid 5 on a windows machine that doesnt perform like shit you have two choices. My experience with hardware and fakehardware raid is that as long as you stay with the same vendor, the raid metadata will be recognized ive seen this when moving drives between various hp, areca and lsi hardware raid controllers, and with intel, amd and even via hostraid i was pretty surprised when i connected a 250gb hard drive from some old amd desktop box to a hp. Put xfs or even well set ext3, lvm2 on top of it, and you have very flexible solution open for expansion in the future. May 24, 2005 scott lowe responds to a techrepublic discussion and one members raid dilemma. I have scoured through articles written about tuning software and i have used linux software raid for over 10 years. In a hardware raid setup, the drives connect to a raid controller card inserted in a fast pciexpress pcie slot in a motherboard. I do agree though, that hardware raid is the best choice. Second, if your raid card fails, your raid volume fails. Raid hardware vs raid software what is your best option. The only point in using raid, is to handle a drive failure, without causing downtime. Once again, with the io response benchmark, the standings of the cards do not change. Hardware raid still has the three key vulnerabilities it has always had. Software raids have to share resources with the operating system, which is usually not optimized for sharing on that level.
Then, we then put two 128 gb and two 256 gb ssds in raid 0. With software raid your data can be split across different enclosures for complete redundancy one can completely stop working and your data is still ok. Linux md, windows dynamic disks or hardwarebased raid. The motherboards supports inter enterprise rapid storage and i can also do software raid with windows server 2019 afaik. What is the performance implication of hardware vs. The drives are configured, so that the data is either divided between disks to distribute load, or duplicated to ensure that it can be recovered once a disk fails. A redundant array of inexpensive disks raid allows high levels of storage reliability. Raid0 arrays will win you just about any benchmark, but theyll deliver virtually nothing more than that for real world desktop performance. How raid can give your hard drives ssdlike performance. A software raid is free but does carry some overhead on the server and may be less reliable under certain circumstances. Regarding their differences, hw raid is usually hassle free and usually comes with hotswapability. For most workloads, a dedicated hardware raid controller is faster.
Jul 07, 2009 a redundant array of inexpensive disks raid allows high levels of storage reliability. Software raid under linux is pretty stellar feature, and its cpu cost, especially with current hardware, is neglible. You can easily move disks from a failed enclosure to a new one, and all your data is preserved. Feb 21, 2019 everything ive read about software raid over the years has been less than positive, i. I heard that is not possible with softwarefirmware raid. Under software raid, that configuration is performed in the. Software raid, on the other hand, implements the various raid levels in the kernel disk block device code and. The ibm ds4300 you have is actually an lsi box, and has. If you can handle your system being down, for a drive replacement, and worst case, a reinstall, then you dont need raid.
You can run synthetics all day long and create these unrealistically demanding workloads that. Imho, im a big fan of kernel developers non directly related to zfs, so i really prefere mdadm to hardware raid. Raid redundant array of independent disks is a technology which allows users to create an array of physical storage drives, improving redundancy, performance, or capacity. While a file server setup to use software raid would likely sport a quad core cpu with 8 or 16gb of ram, the relative differences in performance. The performance of the hardware raid is about 1015mbsec better for rewrite from the software raids 5560mbsec total.
Hardware raid costs more, but will be free of software raids performance limitations. Software raid, as you might already know, is usually builtin on your os and unlike a hardware raid, you will need to spend a little extra on a controller card. Software raid handles raid commands at the kernel level. Generally speaking, software, fake, and hardware raid all support your normal raid tasks, such as keeping a raid in sync, rebuilding after a drive fails, checking drive health, etc. Soft possibly the longest running battle in raid circles is which is faster, hardware raid or software raid. Scott lowe responds to a techrepublic discussion and one members raid dilemma.
So could i do a software raid 5 of 18 tb total 3x 6 tb. Software raid has advanced significantly in the last few years as of 2012. When running basic io tests ddoflagdirect 5k to 100g files, hdparam t, etc. While the intel raid controller blows the software raid out of the water on sequential reads, surprisingly the windows software raid was better in nearly every other respect. Software vs hardware raid performance and cache usage. Standard raid levels include raid 0, raid 1, raid 2, raid 4, raid 5, raid 6, raid 10, etc. Configuration is still required, but that configuration takes place outside the system. Oct 25, 2007 software raid under linux is pretty stellar feature, and its cpu cost, especially with current hardware, is neglible. Software raid means that the raid is handled by the general purpose os and hardware raid means that the raid is handled by a special purpose satasas controller card that runs its own os, cpu, memory, etc. Your point of ssd caching is moot as hardware raid also have that. Hardware raid is more expensive than software raid, but offers better performance and interoperability. Raid 1 vs backup and software raid 1 vs hardware raid 1. Dec 21, 2005 for hardware raid, that cpu can be in a disk array or in a raid controller.
Hardware raid presents logical disks that are already configured to the system or the san, mirrored and ready to go. It combines multiple inexpensive, small disk drives into an array of disks in order to provide redundancy, lower latency maximizing the chanc. A raid can be deployed using both software and hardware. Here you can perform a disk benchmark under the raid or ahci separately using this tool. For hardware raid, that cpu can be in a disk array or in a raid controller. You can benchmark the performance difference between running a raid using the linux kernel software raid and a. Jun, 2012 generally speaking, software, fake, and hardware raid all support your normal raid tasks, such as keeping a raid in sync, rebuilding after a drive fails, checking drive health, etc. Choosing between software raid and hardware raid depends on what you need to do and cost.
Everything ive read about software raid over the years has been less than positive, i. The real differences come down to reliability and performance and what is handling the raid commands. But the real question is whether you should use a hardware raid solution or a software raid solution. Fake raid has no inherent benefits over honest software raid, they share all hardware and the os people have. What is the performance implication of hardware vs software. In a hardware raid setup, the drives connect to a special raid controller inserted in a fast pciexpress pcie slot in a motherboard.
Ive seen super results with linux software raid, i also use that. Software raid is part of os, so no need to spend extract money. Other than that, using a 1,024kb chunk size removes the block output advantage that the raid card had for the 256kb chunk size raid6. Software raid is almost always a better choice than hardware raid. Great for benchmarks, not so much in the real world. It just has a boot helper to go along with it in the bios. The first thing i had to decide on was hardware versus software raid. Mar 11, 2019 both these ssd raid configurations offer increased performance, but the boost is not as great as the difference between ssd raid 0 vs an ssd running alone i. Nov 15, 2019 hardware raid handles its arrays independently from the host and it still presents the host with a single disk per raid array. Raid is a method of combining multiple disk drives into a single entity in order to improve the overall performance and reliability of your system. One of the first questions we felt needed to be answered was what exactly hardware raid cards do. Lets start the hardware vs software raid battle with the hardware side. The problem with raid 5 and raid 6 in ssd raid arrays is that both these systems require large numbers of disk write operations to accommodate the parity.
Different types of raid controllers support different raid levels. There are 2 major types of raid controllers including software and hardware raid. Software vs hardware raid performance and cache usage server. It is generally fine, however, to use windows software raid on simple storage. Software raid is a type of raid implementation that utilizes operating systembased capabilities to construct and deliver raid services. Aug 10, 2019 running raid or not makes no difference to the chipset. Hdd raid can increase performance from a low level to an acceptable level, while ssd raid may increase performance from an acceptable level to a very high level. Hardware raid costs more, but will be free of software raid s performance limitations. That is what the thread was about, mainly, will raid 1 benefit enough to justify the extra risk and investment for a hw controller. Fake raid is like a software raid that you can boot directly off of, but thats about it.
We used the same benchmark suite found in our ssd charts to measure and compare the performance of different single and multidrive configurations of samsungs 840 pro. This is a method of improving the performance and reliability of your storage media by using multiple drives. Hardware raid is still popular with some people and many of todays hardware raid cards offer kickass performance while lightening the load. Before raid was raid, software disk mirroring raid 1 was a huge profit generator for system vendors, who sold it as an addon to their. It is used to improve disk io performance and reliability of your server or workstation. Jul 15, 2008 hardware beats out software substantially in output for parity raid, with hardware being 66% faster for block output and 20% faster for rewrite performance in a 256kb chunk raid 6. Side by side, intel % change vs software raid 1 intel % increase over microsoft software raid. Jul 23, 2007 1 which is faster, softwarebased raid e. Also, because software raid operates on a partition by partition basis where a number of individual disk partitions are grouped together as opposed to hardware raid. Whether software raid vs hardware raid is the one for you depends on what you need to do and how much you want to pay. It can either be performed in the host servers cpu software raid, or in an external cpu hardware raid. Though, there is very little difference between software and hardware raid as every decision comes down to the performance of the processor. On the other hand, a software raid system requires more cpu cycles and power to run well than a comparable hardware raid system. Oct 30, 2015 while the intel raid controller blows the software raid out of the water on sequential reads, surprisingly the windows software raid was better in nearly every other respect.
Software raid comparison made at the beginning of this article. With cheaper hardware raid you can also lose data if theres a power outage. Jul 06, 2011 reasons for using software raid versus a hardware raid setup. Inconsistent performance for certain hardware raid setups that use flash storage ssd arrays. You can benchmark the performance difference between running a raid using the linux kernel software raid and a hardware raid card.
If anything they should be advised to increase ram and be done with it. Having said that, the above is because of the bbued cache. Windows software raid vs hardware raid ars technica. The software raid works on partition level and it can sometime increase complexity if you mix different partitions and hardware raid. Here are some tips on raid levels and some feedback on the software vs. It uses hardware raid controller card that handles the raid tasks transparently to the operating system. For software raid i used the linux kernel software raid functionality of a system running 64bit fedora 9.
I dont care how good it looks on paper and the numbers gives, it will never be as reliable or stable as hardware raid. Raid redundant array of independent disks is one of the popular data storage virtualization technology. All of these linux raid benchmarks were carried out in a fullyautomated manner using the opensource phoronix test suite benchmarking software. Aug 25, 2010 software raid means that the raid is handled by the general purpose os and hardware raid means that the raid is handled by a special purpose satasas controller card that runs its own os, cpu, memory, etc. It is a way to virtualize multiple, independent hard disk drives into one or more arrays to improve performance, capacity and reliability.
Hardware redundant array of inexpensive disks raid and software raid are two main ways for setting up raid system. And with regards to software raid vs hardware raid, in a production environment, i would never ever consider software raid for a tier1 level storage. Both ssd raid and hdd raid offer data protection options, but there is a crucial. This is hardware raid and, honestly, im guessing it is slower than software raid if really tested, it lack the horsepower to anything much. Mar 14, 20 by definition, fake raid has no inherent benefits over honest software raid, they share all hardware and the os people have better watch over the implementations. Even if your hardware raid box controller chip was top of the line when you bought it, it can quickly become out of date as chip speeds improve, and you wont be able to swap it out for a new one. Software raid vs hardware raid hard disk drives hdd. Apr 14, 2020 there are 2 major types of raid controllers including software and hardware raid. My experience with hardware and fake hardware raid is that as long as you stay with the same vendor, the raid metadata will be recognized ive seen this when moving drives between various hp, areca and lsi hardware raid controllers, and with intel, amd and even via hostraid i was pretty surprised when i connected a 250gb hard drive from some old amd desktop box to a hp g1 microserver, and. Difference between hardware raid and software raid. Hardware raid for parallel virtual file system jenwei hsieh, christopher stanton and rizwan ali dell computer corporation. Before raid was raid, software disk mirroring raid 1 was a huge profit generator for system vendors, who sold it as an addon to their operating systems.
Replacing failed disk in the software raid is a bit more complex. For raid 5 or 6, parity calculations are still done on the cpu in this configuration. You have to firstly tell your system to stop using the disk and then replace the disk. My own tests of the two alternatives yielded some interesting results.
But with budget favoring the software raid, those wanting optimum performance and efficiency of raid will have to go with the hardware raid. A hardware raid controller costs money but has no overhead on the server. Winner windows if you need super fast sequential reads, like youre working with a single big file that happens to be on one contiguous area of disk, if you could control that, then youd want the intel controller. This table summarizes the key differences between hardware and software raids. Running raid or not makes no difference to the chipset. Hardware raid and implications for the future duration. Depending on your budget, get a controller that has a large cache 1gb to 4gb and battery backup. Reasons for using software raid versus a hardware raid setup. The different options for combining the disks are referred to as raid levels. Usually, hardware raid has better performance with the advanced raid levels than software raid. Therefore if you want performance and the capability to sustain multiple drive failure at the same time you should investigate hardware raid solutions. Comparing hardware raid vs software raid setups deals with how the storage drives in a raid array connect to the motherboard in a server or pc, and the management of those drives. Toms hardware conducted benchmarks measuring the performance scaling of a raid 0 system, showing the increases in read and write speeds provided by an array.
Whether software raid vs hardware raid is the one for you depends on what you need to do and. It was a year or two ago that some big hardware website did a raid0 speedup benchmark and they found that for a typical desktop workload you got a 5% speedup for double the cost and half the. It seems that no matter if you use a hardware or a software raid controller, you should expect to lose performance when youre duplicating every write, which makes sense. It is fakeraid, but a class above the other fakes and much faster than any built in parity raid in windows. One person said that softwarebased raid is faster because it has a faster processor and more ramcache something like a xeon 3.
238 143 671 1016 188 1355 722 769 371 1293 920 1499 353 220 271 803 561 112 1449 1325 779 180 518 878 45 377 778 23 1291 1470